| 1 |
> Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have |
| 2 |
> already been rejected Ciaran. It's important to realize that the |
| 3 |
> submissions were intended to AID the developers, not to necessarily be |
| 4 |
> PERFECT in every way. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Of course they have been criticized by Ciaran. In case you didn't know, |
| 7 |
he does this for *every* maintainer-wanted ebuild. They are only |
| 8 |
rejected as long as they have problems. If you fix them, they will be |
| 9 |
accepted if some dev takes responsibility for them, or is recruited to |
| 10 |
maintain them. It's really that simple Sounds like a case where you |
| 11 |
can't stand to have anyone review your work. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> I submitted the ebuilds in good faith in the hope they would help myself |
| 14 |
> and others get the portage tree wrt ROX up to date and correct |
| 15 |
> breakages. In that my "spacing" was not liked, or my "descriptions" were |
| 16 |
> too long is irrelevant. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
No, it isn't irrelevant. We strive to make the portage tree to be of |
| 19 |
high quality. Why settle for less? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-Steve |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives