1 |
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 04:10 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
2 |
> > There are *many* applications in the tree that do not use ALSA, but work |
3 |
> > only via the OSS emulation. Removing this is a bad idea and it would |
4 |
> > definitely be blocked by the games team. Probably half of the packages |
5 |
> > that I maintain require OSS capabilities. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> but they do not require an oss use flag. The point of removing this flag is |
8 |
> to remove "optional" oss support. |
9 |
|
10 |
Umm... you don't know what you're talking about. The "optional" OSS |
11 |
support is in ALSA. The packages have required OSS for sound support. |
12 |
|
13 |
> Have a look at http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=&use=oss for the |
14 |
> useage of this flag. |
15 |
|
16 |
I know what the flag is used for, and I'm not removing it. |
17 |
|
18 |
> And for your games argument. The games ebuilds from the above list I have |
19 |
> looked at, provide both the "alsa" and the "oss" use flag, as do most |
20 |
> really. |
21 |
|
22 |
Do you even know what you're talking about? Have you tried Quake 3? |
23 |
Enemy Territory? Have you noticed that they don't have sound, at all, |
24 |
without OSS emulation? You do know how OSS emulation is turned on, |
25 |
correct? |
26 |
|
27 |
Please do me a favor and quit wasting my time and yours trying to tell |
28 |
me what the packages that I maintain support. |
29 |
|
30 |
> It is not about removing OSS emulation, it is about removing duplicated |
31 |
> backends. |
32 |
|
33 |
You're simply wrong. |
34 |
|
35 |
> > So does anyone have any objections to the others being removed? |
36 |
> > (apm imlib mikmod motif xmms) |
37 |
> |
38 |
> foomaticdb is missing here, I hope you will not forget it |
39 |
|
40 |
It isn't the the desktop profile. It was in the 2006.1 profile, which |
41 |
is desktop's parent. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Chris Gianelloni |
45 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
46 |
x86 Architecture Team |
47 |
Games - Developer |
48 |
Gentoo Linux |