Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: zzam@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: libexec directory inconsistency
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:50:27
Message-Id: 20110424214947.469feebf@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: libexec directory inconsistency by Matthias Schwarzott
1 On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:43:16 +0200
2 Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Sounds like we should fix udev ebuild and some ebuilds installing
5 > udev rules to not use /$(get_libdir)/udev, but plain /lib/udev.
6 >
7 > I used that in believe that /lib is identical or links
8 > to /$(get_libdir) and multilib-strict requires it, but it seems to be
9 > intelligent enough to only deny 64-bit libs to go to /lib.
10 >
11 > So proper udev should use /lib/udev, correct?
12
13 Do you really think it'd be fine for some systems to possibly
14 have /lib64 and /lib with random different contents?
15
16 --
17 Best regards,
18 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: libexec directory inconsistency Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: libexec directory inconsistency Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o>