| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:29:16 -0500 |
| 3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> You may ask why I have offered patches instead of just fixing the |
| 6 |
>> ebuild since I am a team member. That is because even team members |
| 7 |
>> aren't allowed to touch bugs assigned to systemd@g.o [1], |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Well, if there are conflicts within a team then I can agree that no |
| 10 |
> member is allowed to touch the bug without a collaborative decision; |
| 11 |
> but from what it appears this bug has been handed in a way that one |
| 12 |
> member appears to take all decisions and the other member has nothing |
| 13 |
> to say. In particular, comments 5 and 11 change the state of the bug |
| 14 |
> without giving any reasoning about why that change in state was made; |
| 15 |
> this is unacceptable, it gives us no reason to believe the state change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
This is expected, as it is similar to how systemd/gnome is managed :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Alon Bar-Lev. |
Archives