| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:31:28AM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've been pondering this for a while. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> What I came up with was a directory structure that would look something |
| 5 |
> like this: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> /$herd/$subproject/$lang/document.xml |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> For example: |
| 10 |
> /cluster/distcc/en/guide.xml (the distcc guide) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> To me it seems more logical to move the language divider closer to the |
| 13 |
> document so that the translation team doesn't have to translate all of |
| 14 |
> the website (as opposed to /$lang/$proj/$herd). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
In my opinion it is a bad idea to have the language-part so close to the |
| 17 |
document. That would mean that the CVS permissions for each translation team |
| 18 |
would be unmaintainable (meaning hundreds of seperate directories for each |
| 19 |
language, whereas my proposal has one directory). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Documentation should be centralised as much as possible, this goes for |
| 22 |
translations too. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Wkr, |
| 25 |
Sven Vermeulen |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Save some animals, eat a vegetarian. |
Archives