| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:40:28 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> * ordering for _pre is wrong. |
| 5 |
>> hm? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> foo-0.26-live would become foo-0.26_pre1, which would be < 0.26. This |
| 8 |
> is clearly wrong. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No, it is correct and what you want. Upstream is aiming for 0.26, once |
| 11 |
0.26 gets in portage you want to update to the release. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>>> * How are you planning to handle reinstalls? Should installing world |
| 14 |
>>> always reinstall live things? Never? Or what? |
| 15 |
>> depends on the other ebuilds |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> More specifically? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
the live ebuild act as template for a autogenerated _pre, if there is |
| 20 |
something higher than _pre that one will be picked. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>>> * How are live ebuilds selected by the package manager? |
| 23 |
>> live ebuilds gets considered as preN+1 for any purpose. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> So you're saying they *always* get reinstalled as a new version if |
| 26 |
> they're part of the dep tree? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
only on -e since you do not have the live template evaluated again. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
>>> * What's the filename for "live ebuild for SVN trunk/"? What about |
| 31 |
>> foo-${version inside trunk}.live? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> And when trunk is unversioned? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Upstream has an issue, still you know which is the version they aim. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
>>> "live ebuild for SVN branches/0.26/"? |
| 38 |
>> foo-0.26.live? |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Orders incorrectly when 0.26.1 has been released. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
no. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
>> What is inside the template is just concern of the ebuild writer. I |
| 45 |
>> suggest to use the same version as marked in the configure or other |
| 46 |
>> version value the release will get once upstream decides to release. |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> There's no way of getting the desired effect with current dep specs. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Your comment seems unrelated to the text. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Anyway pkgcore and portage devs, I'd like your opinion on this point. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
lu |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-- |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Luca Barbato |
| 59 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 60 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 61 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-- |
| 64 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives