| 1 |
Dnia 2014-09-29, o godz. 19:20:54 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > 1 ) We should |
| 9 |
> > 1a) deprecate the <herd> tag in metadata.xml (that's 17,856 files or |
| 10 |
> > so?) in favour of |
| 11 |
> > 1b) a conversion to their respective <maintainer> tags |
| 12 |
> > 1c) where the <email> tag serves the same purpose as <herd> but |
| 13 |
> > bypasses herds.xml completely by just using the intended alias and |
| 14 |
> > not the name of the herd (which some developers might want to keep |
| 15 |
> > in the <name> tag for whatever purpose). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > [...] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Corrections and comment, please. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> This will lose the information if a maintainer is a project/team or an |
| 22 |
> individual developer, which I think is still useful. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Could we keep this information somehow? Maybe by adding an attribute |
| 25 |
> to the <maintainer> tag, or by using <project> or <team> instead of |
| 26 |
> <name> as the subtag? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Or we can map that off the e-mail address. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
Michał Górny |
Archives