1 |
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Although, I must say, Jorge's is being little premature here, and I |
3 |
> doubt the Council will act rashly. |
4 |
|
5 |
So, while I was trying to be balanced in my reply, I'll admit it may |
6 |
have still been a bit too emotionally motivated. |
7 |
|
8 |
I think this was really the bit that I was reacting to. In general I |
9 |
do agree that it is best to let individual teams make the call before |
10 |
escalating to council. |
11 |
|
12 |
I just don't like attitudes along the lines of "I'll do what I think |
13 |
is best, and if you don't like it you can do it instead." It is true |
14 |
that we're all volunteers, and we all need to be mindful of that. |
15 |
However, if all Gentoo is to somebody is a place to host their |
16 |
sole-committer git repo, you could probably do better. |
17 |
|
18 |
I don't really think that was how Jorge felt, and I think we're all |
19 |
just venting, and my response probably wasn't more helpful than what I |
20 |
replied to, so apologies to all for the line noise. |
21 |
|
22 |
For what its worth, this still isn't on the agenda (I'll probably send |
23 |
out the call later today). I also think that if anybody is feeling |
24 |
really frustrated over the content of stage3/@system and so on, |
25 |
they're probably best off directing that frustration towards getting |
26 |
something like mix-ins supported. :) Gentoo is about choice, but we |
27 |
can only offer the choices that our tools support. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Rich |