1 |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> Although, I must say, Jorge's is being little premature here, and I |
5 |
>> doubt the Council will act rashly. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> So, while I was trying to be balanced in my reply, I'll admit it may |
8 |
> have still been a bit too emotionally motivated. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I think this was really the bit that I was reacting to. In general I |
11 |
> do agree that it is best to let individual teams make the call before |
12 |
> escalating to council. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I just don't like attitudes along the lines of "I'll do what I think |
15 |
> is best, and if you don't like it you can do it instead." It is true |
16 |
> that we're all volunteers, and we all need to be mindful of that. |
17 |
> However, if all Gentoo is to somebody is a place to host their |
18 |
> sole-committer git repo, you could probably do better. |
19 |
|
20 |
In this case I reacted more "emotionally" that I should have. |
21 |
Using your expression above, please consider it as "releng is doing what |
22 |
it thinks is best." As the team lead, I was also expressing that to see |
23 |
something as "ordinary" as deciding if bc should be in stage3 sent to the |
24 |
council to "decide", those pushing for that (and that critic wasn't |
25 |
directed to the council members but those pushing this to council), |
26 |
shouldn't be surprised if releng members get upset and decide to spend |
27 |
their time elsewhere. |
28 |
|
29 |
> I don't really think that was how Jorge felt, and I think we're all |
30 |
> just venting, and my response probably wasn't more helpful than what I |
31 |
> replied to, so apologies to all for the line noise. |
32 |
|
33 |
Yes, I was venting. I got a bit upset to see something as simple and |
34 |
ordinary still being discussed (I believe the last time I read about it |
35 |
had been 2 weeks before). |
36 |
To me, this isn't the first time that someone decides to discuss in the |
37 |
dev ml about releng work, without even bothering to let releng know about |
38 |
it. |
39 |
I know that our policies state that technical issues should be raised in |
40 |
the dev ml, although they also support doing the discussion in specialized |
41 |
mls, but they also mention that one should make an effort to contact those |
42 |
involved in the matter. |
43 |
|
44 |
> For what its worth, this still isn't on the agenda (I'll probably send |
45 |
> out the call later today). I also think that if anybody is feeling |
46 |
> really frustrated over the content of stage3/@system and so on, |
47 |
> they're probably best off directing that frustration towards getting |
48 |
> something like mix-ins supported. :) Gentoo is about choice, but we |
49 |
> can only offer the choices that our tools support. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> -- |
52 |
> Rich |
53 |
|
54 |
Regards, |
55 |
|
56 |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
57 |
Gentoo Developer |