| 1 |
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:01, Christian Andreetta wrote: |
| 2 |
> Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to |
| 5 |
> >> expect IF I use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official |
| 6 |
> >> people figure it's gentoo and when it breaks Gentoo suffers. Gentoo has |
| 7 |
> >> a reputation as a good solid, stable distro. As user and big fan of |
| 8 |
> >> Gentoo I'm concerned - why couldn't sunrise have stayed unoffical like |
| 9 |
> >> BMG. Why does it have to be official? Gentoo can choose to do what it |
| 10 |
> >> feels is right and I will do the same. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It has just to be put clear that in this case "official" doesn't mean |
| 13 |
> "solid", "right", "tested by our best QA", but simply "preferred". That |
| 14 |
> is, I think we're not speaking of "official", but "_basically_ revised" |
| 15 |
> and "encouraged". |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And that's why it has been announced as the best since sliced bred - urging |
| 18 |
all users to give it a try, but with the option to point with the finger on |
| 19 |
them, laughing "Ha, ha, you should have known dumb nuts.", later. Brett is |
| 20 |
absolutely right with his previous emails. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Carsten |
Archives