1 |
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 15:43, Philippe Lafoucrière wrote: |
2 |
> I agree with FRLinux. gentoo is so suffering from these "secret |
3 |
> conversations". |
4 |
|
5 |
Gentoo is suffering from the 'secret conversations' urban myth. |
6 |
|
7 |
> please see all french reactions about this fork : |
8 |
|
9 |
Well my french isn't what it used to be. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Everybody love gentoo there, but complain about the lack of visibility |
12 |
> in the project (I know, gentoo-core is working on it). But I really have |
13 |
> the impression that there's on the one hand the gentoo-core members, and |
14 |
> on the other hand...non-gentoo-core members aka users, devs, docs |
15 |
> managers, etc. |
16 |
|
17 |
The lack of visibility is the lack of organization and the pretty much |
18 |
total freedom developers had, there was no real need to communicate on |
19 |
certain points because it worked as it was. While this had its merits |
20 |
and made Gentoo in what it is today i see more and more that this isn't |
21 |
sufficient anymore (i come from a time when it was possible). This is |
22 |
what the proposed top-level structure intends to tackle. |
23 |
|
24 |
There is not much to say. I can tell you there's nothing special in area |
25 |
51, but if you want to believe it won't change your mind. |
26 |
|
27 |
- foser |
28 |
|
29 |
PS. bad example, of course they're hiding UFOs and aliens and whatnot in |
30 |
area 51. |
31 |
PS II. http://www.se.gnome.org/conspiracy/ |
32 |
PS III. This mail goes as far as Gentoo Linux development, business |
33 |
ventures etc. have a certain secrecy over them which i don't find |
34 |
particular appropriate either. But to a certain degree that is not |
35 |
directly related to the distro as a whole. |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |