Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:36:46
Message-Id: CAATnKFDCLPvinGoSb8uS0+MkAEKh942FhMda_V4ScapQA=e-oQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 12 February 2016 at 18:56, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > So my USE="-* ..." (without letting portage do autounmasking) would
3 > continue to work just like it does now, correct?
4
5
6 I would hope so. And obviously, this feature would be potentially
7 tenous, and might be wise to only
8 activate its mechanics with a parameter to emerge.
9
10 That is, I suggest that unless you have
11
12 --lazy-use
13
14 In your emerge opts, no lazy use mechanics should be applied ( or even
15 considered )
16
17 That way, people who do want the new behaviour can stick it in the
18 default emerge options and \o/
19
20 --
21 Kent
22
23 KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>