Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: New category proposal
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:05:16
Message-Id: 4280CDBC.5020002@egr.msu.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: New category proposal by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Duncan wrote:
5 > Martin Schlemmer posted <1115715727.25756.8.camel@×××××××××.lan>,
6 > excerpted below, on Tue, 10 May 2005 11:02:07 +0200:
7 >
8 >
9 >>Problem with flat tree, is the search times might then suck even more, as
10 >>last I heard, too many dirs/files in one directory have a huge speed
11 >>penalty.
12 >
13 >
14 > Yeah, sure, for ext2/3, but all those small files would suck big time in
15 > ext2/3 anyway. Reiserfs doesn't have either issue, and should be perfect
16 > for portage trees, even for those who still think the reliability isn't
17 > there (I've been /very/ happy with it here, since the data=ordered
18 > default went into the kernel for reiserfs, even when I had defective
19 > memory and was hard-locking fairly frequently due to that), because
20 > portage trees are a simple sync away from replacing anything lost.
21 >
22 > I never remember which one it is, but either jfs or xfs has packed files
23 > as a feature as well, IIRC, so the small file sizes works, altho I believe
24 > it'd still have issues with high file-count dirs.
25 >
26 I'll be the first alt-arch person to scream, Reiser isn't stable on more
27 than half the arch's we support, and forcing users to go to one
28 filesystem just to get decent speed on portage tree searches is silly.
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
31 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
32
33 iQIVAwUBQoDNu2zglR5RwbyYAQIVVxAAlC4Yctbrz/HnnVCtxn2o6IpgeEQ5yRmu
34 0IxSV65iBGJ0MutqO6uhOpWeg50YQEHB121BMkHkdkxOllD+oyxN43MVDHH/9PLu
35 NMPBCHfAi2N6IT8h/563lONEFMw/SYGIT3fCQBn8+pc9IgsHdHkVAo49Az9ahR/2
36 tjKHSrb7ERQE/bFOnE9jmm4bYX9Gdub30J96/3QrMo5KORH1ncmShD1VNf+awmpC
37 vrE/r7JypU9DzmS3tdWuwm7QYCD9jWRDYLscEjrl546uKhTpHDaLerFQ1MNn/p1I
38 Hb8eX4bmBdI58NLtH0Wui+s6fZ6zlBYjKZhdT+mTObYgLTr3hn31rnKPpC46guE6
39 36/qmQT53YMXd9/QMiHVsAkIfujFMO3/eSt6P8wJ3Y+Y7BYjntHJq9RScXWiYCsW
40 idQL9IWAUObNeQvACyukGlMNm1e8QlxdkE+pukYnR2M07xNPJgPcG7eqlAgObohW
41 KBJ+Yr1wpRm4M9DAfzvGgB1EsWuwRO7G0izEadZlCzVjXGc0XH56HFFPqnEOFmxy
42 SJrYqOJSbDAFjUl/Cb1I4zW5g/BuSENIoc5f4M+vmxYXGxTGGX/pLhuXchauh+QP
43 Ux1zwjuSnAek5yDiKaiuiAUaKFO/ug5AsLd0MpkjGEJ4qCSqZ7jObntIlbiaxpyH
44 JSNBRj9hrbs=
45 =uJKJ
46 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
47 --
48 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: New category proposal Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>