1 |
On Thursday 18 March 2004 00:04, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> What's unclear about it? |
3 |
|
4 |
The fact that you don't actually use that naming scheme in your examples? |
5 |
|
6 |
> How could it be made more clear? |
7 |
|
8 |
Use it in the examples. |
9 |
|
10 |
> The goal is making it easy to find tools, scan the list of tools and run |
11 |
> the desired tool. Why go halfway and have two separate prefixes (config- |
12 |
> and update-)? |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm amazed we've managed to keep it down to just those two ;-) |
15 |
|
16 |
I guess I'm just a bit old-fashioned when it comes to UNIX ... why have a long |
17 |
name to type in if there's a shorter one available? ;-) |
18 |
|
19 |
> As for the second part, clearly that particular tool is _not_ |
20 |
> Gentoo-specific, and as such, should not be on the list of things to be |
21 |
> renamed. =) Mea culpa. However it would be helpful if the upstream |
22 |
> maintainer (you in this case) chose to rename it in a similar fashion |
23 |
> (i.e., config-webapp) and provided a Gentoo compatibility symlink at |
24 |
> gentoo-config-webapp in the ebuild. |
25 |
|
26 |
I'm happy to do that - it's a good idea. Hopefully I'll have enough time this |
27 |
weekend to commit the update. Best done soon, before people actuallys start |
28 |
using it ;-) |
29 |
|
30 |
Best regards, |
31 |
Stu |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
34 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
35 |
Missed the php|cruise? http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/cruise-2004/ |
36 |
|
37 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
38 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
39 |
-- |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |