| 1 |
Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 2 |
> Solar, |
| 3 |
> I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a |
| 4 |
> flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Invalidates binary package trees. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My (wrong?) understanding was that this is addressed when portage runs a |
| 10 |
> fixpackages (otherwise what's it doing to all those binary packages?). I ask |
| 11 |
... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I always thought it was known that fixpackages is a non-working kludge; |
| 14 |
my portage tree/binary packages get messed up with almost every package |
| 15 |
move, rename etc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If fixpackages is supposed to be working who should I assign my soon to |
| 18 |
be regular, estimated twice-weekly bug reports to? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards |
| 21 |
Stephan |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives