Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags | ||
| Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:14:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140328171427.57c24f02@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags by yac |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 03:53:47 +0100 |
| 2 | yac <yac@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > What I was describing is the difference between fundamental properties |
| 4 | > of categories and tags. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | You are trying to redefine categories in terms of a concept that they |
| 7 | didn't originally represent. From a package mangler perspective, |
| 8 | categories aren't just "a label" for a package. They're fundamentally |
| 9 | part of a package's name. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags | Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com> |