Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:34:58
Message-Id: 4533B3E4.9040506@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement by Stephen Bennett
1 Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
2 > Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
3
4 The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
5 default when you hit Reply, just the _one_ needs to be special. It's
6 been mentioned over and over again, and never been fixed... I don't care
7 any more, if the reply does wrong way, complain to infra/mailing lists
8 admin.
9
10
11
12 --
13 Best regards,
14
15 Jakub Moc
16 mailto:jakub@g.o
17 GPG signature:
18 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
19 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
20
21 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>