Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:22:34
Message-Id: 20060227171519.5da0e329@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Lance Albertson
1 On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:47:58 -0600 Lance Albertson
2 <ramereth@g.o> wrote:
3 | > So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE="1" rm -fr / in global
4 | > scope and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval
5 | > to fix it?
6 |
7 | Use some common sense when showing an example please. We all know that
8 | something that stupid needs to be delt with quickly.
9
10 If we all recognise that level of stupidity, please explain how the
11 heck this got into the tree:
12
13 http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/sys-apps/bootstrap_cmds/bootstrap_cmds-44.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat)
17 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
18 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>