| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
| 3 |
> <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages, |
| 5 |
> | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions |
| 6 |
> | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE="1" rm -fr / in global scope |
| 9 |
> and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Use some common sense when showing an example please. We all know that |
| 12 |
something that stupid needs to be delt with quickly. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 16 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
--- |
| 19 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 20 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives