1 |
On 02-01-2006 21:12:03 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
2 |
> > If it isn't one person, then you would need to find two persons or even |
3 |
> > more that are completely aligned and have the same visions. Since |
4 |
> > leaders usually are charismatic and controversial where necessary to |
5 |
> > achieve their goals, it is hard to find two that don't get conflicts, |
6 |
> > stalling any vision to become a mission. |
7 |
> To extrapolate from that ... council etc. are incapable of doing "real |
8 |
> work"? ;-) Or in other words, a person is smart, people are dumb |
9 |
|
10 |
Your words here. I don't follow your logic, and I don't see where your |
11 |
statement comes from. I want to make explicit that -- in any case -- I |
12 |
didn't mean my words like that. |
13 |
|
14 |
> > > > Dunno, maybe I'm the loner here thinking this... |
15 |
> > > Maybe a bit idealistic, but I mostly agree :-) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Well, you're not alone for sure ;) However, the amount of measures to |
18 |
> > take, why and what are a bit of an open question to me. I do, however, |
19 |
> > share your concerns of a missing 'Mission Statement'. It is a commonly |
20 |
> > known problem and primary point of concern (ie. Heene). |
21 |
> I guess we should decide on a problem before solving it :-) |
22 |
> Is the problem the lack of a mission statement? I don't see the need for |
23 |
> that, we all have our own definitions what a Gentoo is and why it's |
24 |
> cool. Trying to get that defined will be really tricky (and I predict a |
25 |
> smallish flamewar) |
26 |
|
27 |
I reinserted your first response. It looks like you changed your mind |
28 |
inbetween to me, and that you probably don't agree 'mostly' anymore? |
29 |
|
30 |
> We already have a mission statement - to produce the best software |
31 |
> distribution, ever ;-) |
32 |
> Wether it should be Linux only, GNU-based or a metadistribution is a |
33 |
> rather touchy subject, so please try to keep the discussion |
34 |
> civilized ... |
35 |
|
36 |
Lance mentioned something about what he sees is a niche where Gentoo |
37 |
does quite well. "Produce the best software distribution, ever" sounds |
38 |
a bit vague to me. That's why I agree with Lance for now. Maybe after |
39 |
a little research, trial and error period it turns out to be better to |
40 |
keep the target vague. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Fabian Groffen |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |