| 1 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:08:30 -0700 |
| 2 |
Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I was stating the apparent state of facts. If people are told they're |
| 7 |
> > supposed to go with games team, use their eclass, follow their |
| 8 |
> > policies, that's how it looks to people. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That's an entirely different point from the one I was making. But I'll |
| 12 |
> entertain you anyway. All teams have rules and enforce them. If I commit, |
| 13 |
> say, a python package and I don't use the python eclass, I'm sure to get a |
| 14 |
> bug filed telling me to do so, a python team-member forcing the change on |
| 15 |
> me if I refuse, this escalating to comrel if I complain or reverse the |
| 16 |
> change, etc... So why would it be OK for the python team to coerce and not |
| 17 |
> OK for the games team? In other words, why would the games team have less |
| 18 |
> right to good housekeeping than the python team? Here python is just an |
| 19 |
> example, I could have picked any other team. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Well, maybe it's because you can talk to Python team, discuss and not |
| 22 |
get ignored by them. Unlike games team members who believe it's best to |
| 23 |
ignore certain developers. Then QA team. Then the Council. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
| 28 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives