Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:28:50
Message-Id: 200606150429.44932.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. by Peter
1 On Tuesday 13 June 2006 16:17, Peter wrote:
2 > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't |
4 > >
5 > > particularly helpful....
6 > >
7 > > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about
8 > > what is best for their system, and utterly clueless about how using
9 > > third party software can cause problems for other software.
10 >
11 > It's no such proof. Anyone who rolls a kernel, takes the time to learn
12 > what it entails, understands what he/she is intending to do, knows the
13 > ramifications of those actions. Gentoo users, in particular, by virtue of
14 > the fact that this is a source-based distro, have to be accorded a
15 > slightly higher level of respect and regard.
16
17 you clearly have never heard of love/nitro sources and all the fun we went
18 through back when they were being "actively maintained"
19
20 being able to download patchsets from the internet, touchup a few lines so
21 they apply without rejects, and releasing the result to the rest of the world
22 deserves no respect/regard ... you've proven you have skills at:
23 - wget
24 - patch
25 - an editor
26 - tar
27
28 the respect/regard comes when the compiled kernel *actually performs*
29 -mike

Replies