| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:35:53PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Btw, the new policy also includes the possibility of refering a |
| 3 |
> > decision to the council in certain cases, see "Resolution and Appeal". |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I've read the policy. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Did i say you didn't? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > > I'm sure nearly every member |
| 10 |
> > > of devrel would agree that they would love to see a Gentoo where devrel |
| 11 |
> > > simply wasn't needed. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I assume you're only refering to conflict resolution again, and i |
| 14 |
> > agree it would be great. I just don't think this is ever going to |
| 15 |
> > happen as long there are more than 50 developers. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Quit assuming I mean anything, you're batting zero for two right now. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
What's the problem? I wasn't sure how you meant it, so i assumed you |
| 20 |
meant it that way. As for batting zero for two, i never heard that |
| 21 |
phrase before and have nfc what it means, but somehow that whole |
| 22 |
statement doesn't seem very friendly to me. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Luckily, I wasn't asking if you thought it was possible. I've merely |
| 25 |
> been stating that it should be possible. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Perhaps i'm misreading this comment too, but i'm taking that one |
| 28 |
personal. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Screw you guys i'm going home. |
| 31 |
Let's not waste any more bandwidth and time on it. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
cheers, |
| 34 |
Wernfried |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org |
| 38 |
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org |
| 39 |
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org |
Archives