1 |
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> The correct solution is to stop forwarding spam and the easiest way is |
4 |
> just stopping forwarding. There are valid policy reasons for not going |
5 |
> that route but continuing forwarding because it is too difficult to |
6 |
> configure gmail is, well, not something I'd be comfortable with. I do |
7 |
> expect more from gentoo devs. |
8 |
|
9 |
Configuring gmail to use POP isn't hard per-se, but it has a lot of limitations. |
10 |
|
11 |
First, there is latency - they basically poll when they want to poll. |
12 |
I find myself hitting refresh all the time as a result so that I don't |
13 |
wait an hour to get my mail. |
14 |
|
15 |
Another issue is that they won't use TLS/SSL unless they trust the |
16 |
certificate, and there is no way to override this. So, your options |
17 |
are credentials possibly going out in plaintext, pay for a |
18 |
certificate, or use a cert provider who won't revoke a certificate |
19 |
even after pointing to private keys posted on github. I suspect this |
20 |
won't be a problem for retrieving mail from Gentoo, but it is one of |
21 |
the reasons that I was desperately trying to forward mail to them. In |
22 |
the end I ended up switching to polling as a result of DKIM and |
23 |
GMail's spam filters. |
24 |
|
25 |
I find email an incredibly frustrating experience all-around. It |
26 |
works great as long as everybody doesn't use anybody for hosting who |
27 |
isn't in the top-10 provider list, and doesn't use a mailing list. |
28 |
Otherwise you get snared in the network of anti-spam tactics that only |
29 |
spammers have the time to figure out how to avoid. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Rich |