| 1 |
William Hubbs schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Maybe FUD is the incorrect way to put it, but I think us doing > something about it at this point is definitely premature since > |
| 3 |
KDBUS is no where near ready to go -- they were forced to retract > it a |
| 4 |
while back because they had to re-think the design. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
kdbus got sent for inclusion in the kernel, and they were sure ready to |
| 7 |
pull off their plan back then if kdbus had been accepted. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Whether switching to eudev now is premature is actually the central |
| 10 |
issue of this whole discussion. Given that dropping support for udev on |
| 11 |
non-systemd systems was narrowly avoided once, and upstream leaves no |
| 12 |
doubt that they are ready to do so once their redesigned kernel message |
| 13 |
bus goes upstream, I say describing such a move as "definitely |
| 14 |
premature" is not warranted. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives