Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Training points for users interested in helping out with ebuild development
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 09:19:56
Message-Id: pan.2009.05.08.09.19.28@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Training points for users interested in helping out with ebuild development by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> posted pan.2009.05.06.17.25.14@×××.net,
2 excerpted below, on Wed, 06 May 2009 17:25:15 +0000:
3
4 > As others have occasionally noted, the assumption seems to be that
5 > developers "do" IRC. While it's certainly a useful thing for those that
6 > do it, I believe I've seen a few developers speak up from time to time
7 > that say they do little if any IRC at all, doing their Gentoo comms via
8 > email (including the lists), bugs, and of course commits. Does the way
9 > remain open for such recruits? This subthread would suggest not, that
10 > IRC is now considered not just convenient or useful, but mandatory. I'd
11 > call that a shame, as it could well block otherwise productive potential
12 > devs.
13
14 To put this subthread to bed, then, the straight answer seems to be "No,
15 the way does not remain open for no-IRC recruits. IRC is required to be
16 a Gentoo dev, period. If a potential recruit isn't interested in IRC,
17 Gentoo isn't interested in them as developers."
18
19 Which, I suppose, is good to know, agree or not.
20
21 --
22 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
23 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
24 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies