| 1 |
On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 |
>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
| 5 |
>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
| 6 |
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() { |
| 7 |
>>> local res= |
| 8 |
>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do |
| 9 |
>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \ |
| 10 |
>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?," |
| 11 |
>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?," |
| 12 |
>>> done |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> echo "[${res%,}]" |
| 15 |
>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used |
| 16 |
>> since 2010? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the eclass |
| 19 |
> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if Ruby |
| 20 |
> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
<sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! </sarcasm>* |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
* Thought the tags probably worth making explicit |
Archives