| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 6 |
>> PV=${PV/0./} |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do it and doesn't require |
| 9 |
>> any variable name changes or any other changes to the ebuild regardless of |
| 10 |
>> what it does. Unfortunately it is also illegal per current PMS as PV is a |
| 11 |
>> read-only variable. Right now I feel that the gain of having PV read-only |
| 12 |
>> (catch a few bugs?) is much lower than the pain (extensive ebuild-dependend |
| 13 |
>> changes when the version scheme changes). Please comment. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I don't really see how making PV not read-only is any easier than using MY_PV. |
| 16 |
> Did you expect changing PV to magically change P, PVR and PF too? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If we can agree to have those values writable we could define a function that |
| 19 |
will handle resetting all those too. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Marijn |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- -- |
| 24 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML |
| 25 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkhnk6UACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xJPgCghPdttL5ruS/qkoZzsrKn8WL7 |
| 31 |
9OAAn3FGZrQMRsRGHlmAgdf1uiyjuJH9 |
| 32 |
=EmW/ |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives