| 1 |
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 2 |
<chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Andreas K. Huettel schrieb: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Summarizing this thread: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> * move setting USE=dri from default/linux/make.defaults to |
| 8 |
>>> targets/desktop/make.defaults |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> +1 by dilfridge, djc, kensington, vapier, pesa, hwoarang |
| 11 |
>> chitanh, titanofold, zerochaos wants to keep this in default profile |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> ===> done because it's still 2:1 (see remark at bottom) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I must say that I am unhappy about this. The packages in question should |
| 16 |
> not be built with dri disabled unless you really *really* know what you |
| 17 |
> are doing. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
++ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It seemed like most who were knowledgeable suggested disabling dri was |
| 22 |
a bad move. I think it is required for kernel-modesetting among other |
| 23 |
things. Why would somebody install xorg and not use dri? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives