| 1 |
Andreas K. Huettel schrieb: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Summarizing this thread: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> * move setting USE=dri from default/linux/make.defaults to |
| 6 |
>> targets/desktop/make.defaults |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> +1 by dilfridge, djc, kensington, vapier, pesa, hwoarang |
| 9 |
> chitanh, titanofold, zerochaos wants to keep this in default profile |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> ===> done because it's still 2:1 (see remark at bottom) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I must say that I am unhappy about this. The packages in question should |
| 14 |
not be built with dri disabled unless you really *really* know what you |
| 15 |
are doing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> We definitely need a better way to come to a consensus about such decisions. |
| 18 |
> Distilling everyone's intent out of the bikeshedding is a pain. I'll |
| 19 |
come up |
| 20 |
> with a separate e-mail about this and some suggestions soon... (or do it |
| 21 |
> yourself, but PLEASE start a separate thread!) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
2:1 after two days on -devel and no indication that the number of |
| 24 |
developers chiming in would be used for decision making. |
| 25 |
If consensus was not required for this decision, then why bother |
| 26 |
reaching it at all? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives