| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 5 |
> And - as I told you the last time you brought this issue up - you're |
| 6 |
> more than welcome to start reviewing ebuilds and commits as well. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm starting to do just that. I've even asked Ciaran to review a |
| 9 |
particular ebuild I was interested in so that I could learn from it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> We have a bugzilla which is open to the public, we have an irc channel |
| 12 |
> [1] (which is even monitored by CIA [2]) for tracking all commits made |
| 13 |
> to the portage tree... what more do you want? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That is handy, thanks. I don't see the IRC channel listed here: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/irc.xml |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So I've emailed www@g.o and asked to have it added. :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> If you so desperately want code review in Gentoo, why don't you do what |
| 22 |
> every other open source software developer has to do to get his ideas |
| 23 |
> through: put some work into it yourself? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
See above. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> I've been wondering: do your emails on this list represent the view of |
| 28 |
> the IEEE organization? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Of course not. But the IEEE *is* all about peer review (as all |
| 31 |
scientists have been for the last few hundred years). And here is a nice |
| 32 |
high-level article about the benefits of peer review while developing |
| 33 |
software for the non-believers :) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
http://www.visibleprogress.com/peer_reviews.htm |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iD8DBQFDCItE2QTTR4CNEQARAtWfAJoDGYt/o6afKSL/7VCxFuAJNYZfHQCgp9N0 |
| 40 |
K9f5keHUSdyd5nat4rit6EM= |
| 41 |
=kXk/ |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives