1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Yes. I think it would be highly beneficial to keep retired devs' blogs |
5 |
on the server. I'm sure there would be a lot of useful content worth |
6 |
keeping on our server. I'm sure the arguments for deleting old blogs |
7 |
will be based on our server resources. I honestly believe that the |
8 |
amount of server space for retired developers' blogs will be trivial at |
9 |
most. Regardless, these blogs may contain important information that |
10 |
will be beneficial to users. In addition, they will serve in |
11 |
documenting some of the history of the development process of Gentoo. I |
12 |
think the small amount of server space/resources that they do consume |
13 |
will be worth it. Just my 2 cents. |
14 |
|
15 |
On Oct 28, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
16 |
|
17 |
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:13:30 +0000, Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |
18 |
> wrote: |
19 |
>> Can you please elaborate on this? I don't see (m)any technical |
20 |
>> difficulties and I *certainly* don't see any legal difficulties. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> It is like removing all posts in the Gentoo-forums from a developer |
23 |
> which left the team. Do you really want to do so and delete the old |
24 |
> blog entries of thrown out developers? |
25 |
> People could still profit from the contents, even if there are no new |
26 |
> adds to this blog. |
27 |
> As the blog should be mostly gentoo-related, I agree that old devs |
28 |
> should not continue there blogs. But again why delete old blogs? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Stefan |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
35 |
> |
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) |
38 |
|
39 |
iD8DBQFBgZBkjT8HAJRHzi0RAlVzAJ4w18AmL6dSWgw/VwKWA8B4Hz+SNACdHtHo |
40 |
nTZTU+yudN1BqyoSjP/ttiM= |
41 |
=vrCh |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |