Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:37:41
Message-Id: 20061031203413.GB15544@ferdyx.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:23:00PM -0500, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > Third, the best proposal I've seen here is for developers to get shell
3 > accounts on alternate architectures. There's quite a few of them
4 > floating around, and I'm pretty sure the arch teams will help you get a
5 > shell on one of the boxes somewhere. Some of the arches even have shell
6 > boxes for that purpose sitting at OSU or something. This would work for
7 > at least the console applications (the visual stuff will be a little
8 > trickier).
9
10 Just to add a little thing here:
11
12 Arch teams have been using vnc through ssh to test visual stuff like
13 gnome, kde, xfce and their respective mothers, for years.
14
15 So testing visual stuff remotely *is* possible.
16
17 - ferdy
18
19 --
20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
21 Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
22 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>