| 1 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Perhaps we could consider GitLab? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+1 on that. I have deployed it recently at work and it seems to perform |
| 6 |
well. *Really* easy to use. Easy to deploy as well. It's written in |
| 7 |
Ruby, *not Java*. It's possible to have a basic integartion with |
| 8 |
external issue trackers. It also has an LDAP auth. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+1 on docs. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We should focus on forcing people who were involved into OpenRC to |
| 14 |
document what they know. I could do some contributions to OpenRC, but I |
| 15 |
don't have time for reverse engineering. I have developed some |
| 16 |
experimental Plytmouth plugin to OpenRC, but it was really time |
| 17 |
consuming to guess what does what... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We cannot let OpenRC die. It cannot happen that systemd and upstart are |
| 20 |
the only init systems. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
Archives