1 |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Now, since I work on these arches just to help, i.e. I don't have any business |
4 |
> and I do non have any installation of those arches and the work I'm doing is |
5 |
> not appreciated at all I decided to stop for now. |
6 |
|
7 |
I wouldn't say that your work is unappreciated. However, when those |
8 |
are called "unmaintained" arches it reflects the fact that very few |
9 |
are contributing to them. The nature of a linux distro is that one |
10 |
person could be working 24x7 with bleeding fingers and it would be |
11 |
like sticking a finger in a dike. It takes more than one contributor |
12 |
(even a serious one) to make something like this viable. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I will take a break also from amd64 and x86...let's see how things will |
15 |
> change. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'm not sure I really see the connection but you're of course welcome |
18 |
to work on whatever you want to. In the case of amd64 we already |
19 |
encourage individual package maintainers to stabilize their own |
20 |
packages, and I think this is much more sustainable than having an |
21 |
arch team do it. Back when amd64 was exotic and a lot of packages |
22 |
needed patching to work having a focused arch team to handle this made |
23 |
a lot of sense - they owned the hardware and also were accustomed to |
24 |
spotting type errors and so on. These days upstream just works on |
25 |
amd64 and everybody is using it. |
26 |
|
27 |
I'm not diminishing your contributions in any way (which have always |
28 |
been tremendous). I'm just saying that a model that depends less on |
29 |
heroics would benefit everybody. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Rich |