1 |
maillog: 20/09/2005-07:21:08(+0200): Christian Parpart types |
2 |
> On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote: |
3 |
> > Mark Loeser wrote: |
4 |
> > > Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
5 |
> > >> I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing |
6 |
> > >> development utilities of some sort. There might be some |
7 |
> > >> misclassifications in them, but from a user perspective I don't really |
8 |
> > >> care about the language anything is written in. As C++ is so |
9 |
> > >> widespread I don't think that anything but app-misc or the like should |
10 |
> > >> be moved into a dev-cpp category. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > This isn't for what the package is written in, but more for what the |
13 |
> > > package is for. If the package is a utility for use when doing coding |
14 |
> > > with C++, like the ones I listed, then I think it should be in dev-cpp. |
15 |
> > > That's what the metadata for the category describes it to be. |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > Mark |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Once again I'd like to point out that organizing packages in the tree by |
20 |
> > category is a stupid idea for this very reason. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> and what's *your* certain proposal then? |
23 |
|
24 |
That's been discussed a number of times already. The best idea is to |
25 |
leave the categories alone and forget that the category means anything. |
26 |
Or, to throw the ball back in your court, could *you* suggest |
27 |
alternatives that accomplish the following: |
28 |
|
29 |
(quoting [1]:) |
30 |
|
31 |
More precisely, what I'd like to see, in order of preference, is |
32 |
|
33 |
- that package in my overlay that has net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager |
34 |
in its *DEPENDs to work for as long as needed |
35 |
- the net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager that I have in my overlay to work |
36 |
for as long as needed |
37 |
- my net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager binary packages to work without |
38 |
having to be "fixpackage"d |
39 |
- the location of the ebuilds for net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager to |
40 |
stay in the same physical path on my filesystem |
41 |
|
42 |
end quote |
43 |
|
44 |
I would grade the above features as "vital", "badly needed", "happy to |
45 |
see it done", "cosmetic". I.e., even solving only the first one is |
46 |
enough, though if you could get to number two it would be better. |
47 |
|
48 |
1: |
49 |
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.dev/tree/browse_frm/thread/26b3b93fe16de00c/3ffe93800adbc578?fwc=1#o3ffe93800adbc578 |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
/\ Georgi Georgiev /\ Vulcans never bluff. -- Spock, "The Doomsday /\ |
53 |
\/ chutz@×××.net \/ Machine", stardate 4202.1 \/ |
54 |
/\ +81(90)2877-8845 /\ /\ |