Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:11:54
Message-Id: 1176487706.5795.15.camel@sputnik886.lnet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 > > > The arch teams have been pushing for this for a long time. They're
2 > > > trying to get this enforced, but are having limited success because
3 > > > there's no way for FEATURES=test to become widely used that won't
4 > > > lead to broken user systems. Moving src_test to be always on in
5 > > > future EAPIs is an easy way of helping arch teams achieve this goal
6 > > > without breaking anyone's system in the meantime.
7 > >
8
9 Hmm, as an arch tester, i completely agree that packages where src_test
10 fails are an annoyance. However, I would not suggest to activate
11 src_test by default, as for normal users, it just introduces another
12 source of potential defects, without that much benefits. Instead, i
13 think that arch teams should refuse to stable packages that fail with
14 FEATURES=test and thus encourage ebuild developers to either fix their
15 tests, or to deactivate them explicitly.
16
17 Matthias
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>