Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <msterret@××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Modular X plans
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:34:08
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.61.0508021027200.28983@rutrow.coat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2
3 > I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
4 > best be expedited (read below for why).
5
6 Well, I kind of mentioned it on irc, but I'll throw it out here too.
7 I think the name "proto" is pretty vague and would prefer
8 to see headers (ala sys-kernel/linux-headers, etc.) but since upstream
9 uses that name, I guess I can live with it.
10
11 Michael Sterrett
12 -Mr. Bones.-
13 mr_bones_@g.o
14 --
15 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Modular X plans "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>