Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 06:09:40
Message-Id: 42EF0D9A.4070304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans by Donnie Berkholz
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
5 | The new categories are x11-apps, x11-proto and x11-drivers. Of these,
6 | the name for x11-proto (the protocol headers) is debatable. The upstream
7 | module they're all in is called "proto," and their pkg-config (*.pc)
8 | files are called fooproto. But I'm also open to names such as
9 | x11-protocol or x11-headers, so let me know what you think makes the
10 | most sense, both in understanding the meaning and in combination with
11 | upstream's naming.
12
13 I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
14 best be expedited (read below for why).
15
16 | I intend to begin adding these packages to the tree shortly after the
17 | first release candidate, which should be happening very soon.
18
19 As I said, very soon. It's out. I will begin adding new categories as
20 necessary and the beginnings of the modular tree tomorrow.
21
22 Thanks,
23 Donnie
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iD8DBQFC7w2ZXVaO67S1rtsRAom4AJ9r3J8Y8QzfNzSXD5ArbrIdh9xMnwCguB6k
28 UJ8lEfU6ex06MnENpZuJhhQ=
29 =CgWz
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans Ian Leitch <port001@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Modular X plans "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <msterret@××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>