Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:54:00
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43O0iz3CRoNVnxVuxW3WOCUFp1po9sxK8Q4+4mLPt_K9Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords by Thomas Deutschmann
1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:28 PM Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On 2020-04-11 17:33, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > 1. We kill both keywords, and just rely on components, or
5 > >
6 > > 2. I make NATTkA automatically add KEYWORDREQ or STABLEREQ where
7 > > appropriate.
8 >
9 > I think you cannot kill it.
10 >
11 > Yes, we have a component for stabilization/keywording, but we also do
12 > stabilization from security bugs which don't have such a component and
13 > some tools must be able to filter.
14
15 Someone proposed that we change the security bug workflow to include a
16 separate stable request bug, which would resolve this.
17
18 That would also help in cases where we are stabilizing
19 security-unsupported archs at the same time.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords David Seifert <soap@g.o>