Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:29:10
Message-Id: 28b5b4cc-8509-3e37-7f2c-962515b488ed@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords by "Michał Górny"
1 On 2020-04-11 17:33, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > 1. We kill both keywords, and just rely on components, or
3 >
4 > 2. I make NATTkA automatically add KEYWORDREQ or STABLEREQ where
5 > appropriate.
6
7 I think you cannot kill it.
8
9 Yes, we have a component for stabilization/keywording, but we also do
10 stabilization from security bugs which don't have such a component and
11 some tools must be able to filter.
12
13 Just checking CC list is not an option because in theory, you can CC
14 architectures when you are just requesting some input from them.
15
16 So I would tend to #2. It doesn't really hurt, does it?
17
18
19 --
20 Regards,
21 Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
22 C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>