| 1 |
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:59:29 -0800 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> The issue that was raised is that certain arch teams are incapable of |
| 4 |
> keeping up with the minimal workload they already have and what should |
| 5 |
> be done about it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The issue was raised, with absolutely no proof or justification, and |
| 8 |
every previous time said issue has been raised it's turned out to be |
| 9 |
somewhere between highly misleading and utter bollocks. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> We want the Council to do something about this issue. You can deny |
| 12 |
> the issue all that you want or try to deflect conversation from the |
| 13 |
> actual issue, but your opinion isn't very important to the much of |
| 14 |
> the current developer pool, seeing as how it doesn't affect you in |
| 15 |
> any way, having been thrown from the project, and all. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ah, so now what matters is who says something, not whether or not it's |
| 18 |
true. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives