Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:36:21
Message-Id: 37083.192.168.2.159.1199892973.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January by Ciaran McCreesh
1 > The issue was raised, with absolutely no proof or justification, and
2 > every previous time said issue has been raised it's turned out to be
3 > somewhere between highly misleading and utter bollocks.
4
5 Let's assume that you are right, and that dropping keywords is not a proper thing to
6 do.
7
8 What's the proper fix for when keyword requests stagnate in bugzilla? If the arch
9 team in question was to completely disband and stop all keywording today, then
10 you're suggesting the proper thing to do is to never remove the ebuild from portage
11 that has keywords for that arch?
12
13 And thus, the current system of filing a stabilization request and waiting
14 indefinitely is sufficient?
15
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>