| 1 |
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:37 +0200 |
| 2 |
Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> And why don't we change the versioning of the EAPI to a "X.Y" scheme |
| 4 |
> and demand that changes in the minor version must not break sourcing |
| 5 |
> of the ebuild with older package managers and that major versions do. |
| 6 |
> Major version numbers are written in the postfix, while minor version |
| 7 |
> numbers are written in the ebuild itself as EAPI_MINOR="1". So, the |
| 8 |
> current EAPI 1 would then be in fact "0.1". |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No point. A 0 package manager still couldn't use a 0.1 ebuild. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives