| 1 |
On 09/05/2012 05:29 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Yes, I stated it because I view it as useful/sane. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> and isn't a compromise at all. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I think you're mistaken in assuming a compromise is the required |
| 8 |
> outcome of this. Given the choice between something productive, and |
| 9 |
> something not productive, you don't choose the quasi-productive |
| 10 |
> solution. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
From a developer's perspective, it's obviously better to be able to do |
| 13 |
whatever you want. But for users it'd be nice to be able to request a |
| 14 |
bump to EAPI5 and not get told to buzz off. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Some people are unhappy with the current situation or this thread |
| 17 |
wouldn't exist. A good compromise should make everyone just a little bit |
| 18 |
unhappy =) |
Archives