| 1 |
I don't understand half of what you said. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
You are saying that PMS is a sub-project of QA? Is the PMS spec hosted |
| 4 |
on Gentoo infrastructure? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>From all I have read, PMS is meant to define the functionality of |
| 7 |
Paludis itself, which is not a Gentoo project. Because of this, PMS |
| 8 |
can't be considered a Gentoo project. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-Daniel |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 3/2/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
> On Saturday 03 March 2007, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 14 |
> > On 3/2/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 15 |
> > > So, er, to whom does this deadline apply then, if not the people |
| 16 |
> > > writing PMS? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > I have no clue. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > PMS is not a Gentoo project, so they can't impose a deadline on you. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> except that it really is |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> the council asked spb to put the EAPI spec together and it was moved to the |
| 25 |
> space that is now dubbed PMS space |
| 26 |
> -mike |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives