| 1 |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:49:02 +0200 Alexandre Buisse <nattfodd@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:27:31 +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I just understand it so, that if a user submits a new ebuild he has to |
| 6 |
> > in fact maintain it. So overall maintenance time required by his |
| 7 |
> > operating system will be pretty high. Because besides the |
| 8 |
> > 'emerge --sync' and 'emerge -u world', he needs take care of "his" |
| 9 |
> > ebuilds. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I think you misunderstood luis' proposition. Everything would go on |
| 12 |
> as now, including users submitting ebuilds on bugzilla and not |
| 13 |
> "maintainaing" them anymore, but there would also be the solution of |
| 14 |
> asking to do more and being |
| 15 |
> a user_maintaining_an_ebuild_through_a_proxy_dev. If you don't want |
| 16 |
> to do that or don't have the time, and I expect it will be the case |
| 17 |
> of 99.9% of the users, it's fine. This project is only here for the |
| 18 |
> remaining 0.1 %. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So it is something like communication channel between developers and |
| 21 |
users willing to maintain some ebuild? If yes, it is great. I see no |
| 22 |
problem then. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Robert |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Robert Cernansky |
| 29 |
E-mail: hslists2@××××××.sk |
| 30 |
Jabber: HS@××××××.sk |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives