Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexandre Buisse <nattfodd@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:53:04
Message-Id: 20060728194902.GA14044@ubik
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?) by Robert Cernansky
1 On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:27:31 +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote:
2
3 > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:26:31 -0400 Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 > > Robert Cernansky wrote:
6 > > > Oh, if I can speak for me as a user I'll not like it. One of the
7 > > > major advantage of Gentoo is easy maintenace (not mindless, but
8 > > > easy if you know what you are doing) thanks to portage
9 > > > system. Another is availability of large number of software in
10 > > > distribution. These two together gives easily maintanable
11 > > > operating system - because of portage and because I do not need to
12 > > > maintain lot of packages by myself.
13 > >
14 > > I don't know what it is your point here. But i guess, yes, as an
15 > > user you shouldn't be worried about it. This is just another way for
16 > > cooperating with the project for those interested in doing so.
17 >
18 > I just understand it so, that if a user submits a new ebuild he has to
19 > in fact maintain it. So overall maintenance time required by his
20 > operating system will be pretty high. Because besides the
21 > 'emerge --sync' and 'emerge -u world', he needs take care of "his"
22 > ebuilds.
23
24 I think you misunderstood luis' proposition. Everything would go on as
25 now, including users submitting ebuilds on bugzilla and not
26 "maintainaing" them anymore, but there would also be the solution of
27 asking to do more and being a
28 user_maintaining_an_ebuild_through_a_proxy_dev. If you don't want to do
29 that or don't have the time, and I expect it will be the case of 99.9%
30 of the users, it's fine. This project is only here for the remaining 0.1 %.
31
32
33 /Alexandre
34 --
35 Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?) Robert Cernansky <hslists2@××××××.sk>