1 |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:24:48 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On Tuesday 27 July 2004 5:39 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
| > I'd hardly call 30,000 emails and however many forums posts there |
5 |
| > are"nothing". |
6 |
| |
7 |
| Wasn't it you who called them the "vocal minority"? |
8 |
|
9 |
No, I said that that provided strong evidence that we do have a vocal |
10 |
minority who go around demanding the latest x.x.x.1 releases, spamming |
11 |
other distributions' IRC channels, using broken kernels and so on. |
12 |
|
13 |
| Right, a completely isolated case. As a package maintainer should |
14 |
| know more than most users. But ultimately, most bugs (that haven't |
15 |
| been closed out as INVALID/etc) are either problems with the way |
16 |
| something works now, or an enhancement request. You think that votes |
17 |
| get cast for stupid things? Do you really think our users are stupid? |
18 |
|
19 |
I think votes will get cast for trivial cosmetic features (example: |
20 |
bootsplash) rather than the subtle can-make-your-system-die-horribly |
21 |
bugs. So, for those kinds of bugs, we'll either have to ignore the |
22 |
voting (which pretty much defeats the object of having votes at all) or |
23 |
focus on the 'popular' enhancements at the expense of having a working |
24 |
system. |
25 |
|
26 |
| For developers such as yourself, what are you worried about? Ignore |
27 |
| the votes and keep working on your buglist like you normally would. I |
28 |
| fail to see the problem here. |
29 |
|
30 |
I am worried that I will see posts saying "why are you ignoring the |
31 |
several hundred votes on this bug?" on bugs for small cosmetic issues |
32 |
(example: bootsplash) when there are far more important bugs which don't |
33 |
attract votes. Although *I* will be ignoring the votes, the voters won't |
34 |
be. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
38 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
39 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |