From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SDL2 update |
Date: | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:37:53 |
Message-Id: | 521E0B38.3070604@gentoo.org |
1 | Since the project lead doesn't respond to private mails, is not present |
2 | in the projects IRC channel and does not comment on my bug reports I |
3 | want to ask here for review of the following packages, because those are |
4 | non-trivial libraries: |
5 | |
6 | SDL2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826 |
7 | sdl-image2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481798 |
8 | sdl-mixer2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481796 |
9 | sdl-net2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481794 |
10 | smpeg2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481792 |
11 | sdl-ttf2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481788 |
12 | |
13 | They are all currently SLOT 2, but as discussed with Mr_Bones_ this will |
14 | be a major pain for update, so the ebuilds will probably end up as new |
15 | packages such as "media-libs/libsdl2" which is the easiest way. |
16 | |
17 | Another thing is that smpeg2 update cannot be installed in parallel with |
18 | the old one, unless we rename the "/usr/bin/plaympeg" binary (and I |
19 | don't know if that will break consumers). So that is probably going to |
20 | stay non-renamed and in slot 0. |
21 | |
22 | |
23 | keep comments short, don't bikeshed |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SDL2 update | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SDL2 update | "Paweł Hajdan |